I completely disagree with Popova on the value of discovery.
The value of authorship is much more clear. But regardless of how much time it takes to find interesting links every day, I don’t think most intermediaries deserve credit for simply sharing a link to someone else’s work.
Reliably linking to great work is a good way to build an audience for your site. That’s your compensation.
In the battle for the Interest Graph (essentially a graph of what you like) between Facebook, Google+ and Twitter, Facebook has one huge advantage. It has third party content deeply embedded in its platform. Google+ is actually better in many ways for finding and tracking media content, but it has no advanced API and therefore third parties cannot integrate into Google+ like they can on Facebook. And Twitter is too ephemeral. Media sharing is of the moment in Twitter and it’s not properly archived - like on a Timeline.
It seems that while many of us are addicted to celebrity gossip and war games, we don’t want everyone to know. We might geek out privately with fellow enthusiasts about Kim Kardashian’s latest romance or a new Call Of Duty map pack, but there’s a stigma about allowing those interests to define our identities. Meanwhile, our social graphs often span across party lines, so we’d rather not share polarizing political content. Better to stay silent than offend someone, it seems. Out of top 100 stories most often published to Timeline, only 244 shares were political and 72 were gaming stories.

Josh Constine, Digg Data Reveals What We Read But Are Too Scared or Embarrassed To Share, Feb. 24, 2012

This describes the problem any Social Graph-based algorithm is facing: what interests us is not necessarily what we share and that’s why curation based on the Social Graph alone delivers less relevant content to the individual reader.

Sharing trends by AddThis:
Facebook owns >50% of sharing
Twitter sharing grows 576.9%
Tumblr sharing grows 1,299.5 and is ACCELLERATING
Google +1 grows 373% and has plateaued

Sharing trends by AddThis:

  • Facebook owns >50% of sharing
  • Twitter sharing grows 576.9%
  • Tumblr sharing grows 1,299.5 and is ACCELLERATING
  • Google +1 grows 373% and has plateaued
>

Robin Good - new media publisher: Are You After Republishing More Content Easily or Becoming a Trusted Filter For Your Tribe?

robingood:


Dr. Rachna Jain has a short, valuable article on content curation and its benefits up on his blog. In particular, he is good in highlighting the fact that there is more than one approach to curation, a superficial-one geared to just shoot out more content while having an easier life at it,…

Curation, like making a website, is an act of self-interest that enriches the commons and benefits everybody. I need to search, scan, and select the best resources I can find for my own personal interests, and by making my choices available to others, I create a resource for many besides myself. Curation is also a signal to others who share my interests, people I probably would not have known or known about otherwise, who, in turn, suggest resources to me. I feed the networks of people who do me the honor of valuing my choices, and they feed me back. It’s about knowing, learning, sharing, and teaching, all in one.
Howard Rheingold (via savvides)